2020 Voter Fraud Coup

 

 AMERICA UNDER SIEGE.

"Color Revolution": Biden team is following carefully scripted coup intended to take down America

'This is a carefully scripted coup intended to take down our constitutional republic and transform it into something unrecognizable to our Founders and inimical to our liberties'

November 5, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – I know that some of you may be dispirited, even despairing, that Trump and all of us who support him didn’t achieve a decisive win on election day.  But events are moving very quickly now.  We need everyone to get back on their feet and back in the game.  Your country needs you.  The babies need you.

The first thing everyone must recognize is the seriousness of the current situation.  We are in the middle of what is called Color Revolution.  This is a carefully scripted coup intended to take down our constitutional republic and transform it into something unrecognizable to our Founders and inimical to our liberties. 

This means that what just happened was not a “normal” election.  Rather, it was a pre-scripted scam used by the revolutionaries to determine how many votes they needed to tip the balance in their favor.  Once they knew that number—in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania—late ballots are being “discovered” to put their candidate in the lead.  This is how the Left operates in places like Venezuela.  It must not be allowed to succeed here.

The forces arrayed against us are formidable.  I’m not talking here just about the Democrat Party.  Despite the fact that it has been hollowed out by Socialists, it alone could be dealt with.  Rather, I’m talking also about the Globalists and their institutions, including Wall Street and the major U.S. media.  And, of course, I’m talking about the Chinese Communists and their many front organizations and flunkies in the United States. Joe Biden is the compromise candidate of all these groups.

In the same way, the chaos is not just about President Trump; it is about defeating and disarming every last one of us who believes in the promise of America as a sovereign nation that defends life, protects liberty, and preserves equal justice before the law.  As the president has said, “They are really after you.  I am just in the way.”

 

In order to encourage each other and organize, we must all move onto new media.  Even Fox (aside from the evening talk show hosts) can no longer be trusted.  Sign up for LifeSiteNews and other news sites like Epoch Times, Breitbart, Newsmax, One America News (OAN), or Real America’s Voice.  Use Twitter but link up on Parler as well for the day when @Jack shuts you down like he has so many others.   

To encourage ourselves and others, keep the Trump signs up and the flags flying.  Ramp back up the Trump Trains that shocked the opposition.  I look for the President and his surrogates to start holding rallies again soon.  It’s a great way for him to bypass the hostile media and speak directly to the American people.  

Don’t listen to the voices of surrender—there will surely be a few of these from the members of the Republican Establishment.  Take your cues instead from people like Newt Gingrich, Tom Cotton, Allen West, Mike Huckabee, Donald Trump Jr., and, of course, from the President himself.  

Finally and most importantly, we must pray.  Try to spend some time before the Blessed Sacrament to pray for our country and our president.  The late, great Father John Hardon often reminded us to never underestimate the graces that flow from spending any amount of time in His Eucharistic presence.

Prayer can change history.  We all know about the Battle of Lepanto.  But let me also share with you a much more recent example that comes from the “People Power” revolution in the Philippines which was shared with me by Cardinal Jaime Sin, the then-Cardinal-Archbishop of Manilla, over dinner some years ago.

In 1986, the people of Manilla rose up and demanded an end to the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos.  Cardinal Sin was afraid that the demonstrations, which grew larger every day, would end in a government crackdown and much bloodshed. 

He called all of the convents in the country and begged the nuns to get down on their knees before the Blessed Sacrament and pray for divine intervention.  “Raise your arms to Heaven as Moses did and pray for victory,” he told them.  “Pray that Marcos will step down, and democracy restored.”

The key moment came when the demonstrators approached the presidential palace.  The palace guard was lined up in firing position.  Just as the commander was about to give the order to fire, a beautiful lady appeared in the sky before the soldiers.  They all simultaneously took their fingers off the triggers.

The massacre was averted and Marcos fled.

 

In order to defeat those who would steal not just an election, but our very country, we must likewise storm Heaven.

Steven W. Mosher is the President of the Population Research Institute and the author of Bully of Asia: Why China’s Dream is the New Threat to World Order

CON'T

As devout Christians and faithful citizens of the United States of America, we have intense and heartfelt concern for the fate of our beloved country while the final results of the Presidential election are still uncertain.

News of electoral fraud is multiplying, despite the shameful attempts of the mainstream media to censor the truth of the facts in order to give their candidate the advantage. There are states in which the number of votes is greater than the number of voters; others in which the mail-in vote seems to be exclusively in favor of Joe Biden; others in which the counting of ballots has been suspended for no reason or where sensational tampering has been discovered: always and only against President Donald J. Trump, always and only in favor of Biden.

In truth, for months now we have been witnessing a continuous trickle of staggered news, of manipulated or censored information, of crimes that have been silenced or covered up in the face of striking evidence and irrefutable testimony. We have seen the deep state organize itself, well in advance, to carry out the most colossal electoral fraud in history, in order to ensure the defeat of the man who has strenuously opposed the establishment of the New World Order that is wanted by the children of darkness. In this battle, you have not failed, as is your sacred duty, to make your own contribution by taking the side of the Good. Others, enslaved by vices or blinded by infernal hatred against Our Lord, have taken the side of Evil.

Do not think that the children of darkness act with honesty, and do not be scandalized if they operate with deception. Do you perhaps believe that Satan’s followers are honest, sincere, and loyal? The Lord has warned us against the Devil: “He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he speaks in character, because he is a liar and the father of lies” (Jn 8:44).

 Trump Planned Ahead!! Secretly Marked All Official Ballots, like the Silk Threads in U S Money Paper.

 

Ugly as Sin

News Feed posts Daily magyar 2h · Csúnya, mint a bűn. [ˈtʃuːɲɑ mint ɑ byːn] or Csúnya, akar a bűn. [ˈtʃuːɲɑ ɑkɑr ɑ byːn] (gipsy slang) Translation: He/she/it is ugly as sin. Meaning: He/she/it is ugly as fuck.; He/she/it is really ugly. csúnya [ˈtʃuːɲɑ] – ugly; nasty mint [ˈmint] – than; as…as; like akár [ˈɑkaːr] – just like; as; like akar [ˈɑkɑr] 1) just like; as; like (dialectical word or gipsy slang) 2) he/she wants akarni [ˈɑkɑrni] – to want bűn [ˈbyːn] – sin; vice; guilt

Black Like Me, or You, or Us. Whatever (Draft)

Jessica A. Krug, then an associate professor at George Washington University, posted a confession on the publishing platform Medium, last Thursday, explaining that she is not who she’d been claiming to be. “To an escalating degree over my adult life,” she wrote, “I have eschewed my lived experience as a white Jewish child in suburban Kansas City under various assumed identities within a Blackness that I had no right to claim: first North African Blackness, then US rooted Blackness, then Caribbean rooted Bronx Blackness.” Her life and, by extension, her scholarly career—or is it the other way around?—had been based on a lie, she admitted, or rather a glut of them, feeding on good faith like, as Krug put it, “not a culture vulture” but “a culture leech.”The blog post is light on details—the where, when, and how of Krug’s masquerade. She speculates that “mental health issues” were an impetus for her behavior; professionals have assured her that altered identity is a “common response” to “the severe trauma” that she incurred during childhood. But she does not name a diagnosis or elaborate upon the instigating traumatic events, resorting instead to the generic jargon of self-help, blended with the D.I.Y. verbiage endemic to the self-care branch of social justice: “redress,” “harm,” “gaslit,” “belonging,” “accountability.” (Absent are the words “sorry” and “apologize.”) The post is not well written, but it wants to be—its self-flagellations taking on the repetitious rhythms of slam poetry. (“I am a coward…. I am a coward”; “Intention never matters more than impact.”) The performance is, above all, profoundly awkward. For all her apparent study of the ways in which certain oppressed groups address wrongs that are done, Krug proves incapable of writing her way to recompense. “You should absolutely cancel me, and I absolutely cancel myself,” she writes, borrowing, with all sincerity, a term of cultural panic that lost its candor eons ago. “What does that mean?” she asks. “I don’t know.” Within twenty-four hours, a group of Krug’s colleagues at G.W. released a statement calling on her to resign or, if not, to be stripped of her tenure and fired. “With her conduct, Dr. Krug has raised questions about the veracity of her own research and teaching,” the G.W. Department of History said in a written statement posted to its Web site. On Wednesday, it was announced that Krug had resigned. (She did not respond to my requests to speak with her.)
It seems that Krug exposed herself to avoid being exposed. “I had been following her transformation for a while,” a scholar in Krug’s field told me. The scholar, a junior professor who wished to remain anonymous, met Krug more than a decade ago. “The first time I encountered her, she would talk about ‘us’ and ‘we,’ ” the junior professor said over the phone. “And I was scratching my head, like, ‘us’ and ‘we’? And then I realized she meant Black.” Specifically, “part Algerian”—Krug said that she was the daughter of Algerian immigrants on her mother’s side, and that her father was a white man of German origin. “I took her at her word,” the professor said, “But I always had certain misgivings.” Krug spoke back then of trauma as part of her heritage, describing herself as the product of rape between her mother and father, and the junior professor said that she didn’t want to impinge on Krug by bringing it up, even as she and other friends, all Latinx, harbored doubts about Krug’s claims. The way Krug spoke about the junior professor’s own identity was part of what aroused her suspicion. “I’m middle class. I’ve never tried to be anything else,” she said. “I think she was pushing me or encouraging me to adopt a more radical political position.” These sorts of challenges ate away at the remaining amiability between
Krug and her Afro-Latinx peers. “There came a point when we were just, like, ‘This is bullshit.’ ” Still, they were operating on a feeling. Without proof or a violation of academic protocol or issues with Krug’s scholarship—“I always respected her intellectually,” the junior professor said—there was nothing to be done but add distance. “There wasn’t any big dramatic moment. I just quietly severed the relationship on all fronts.”
Years later, Krug came back on the scholar’s radar when mutual friends on Facebook shared articles Krug had written for RaceBaitr, a platform for race-forward news and criticism, and later for Essence. Those articles, now deleted (though Krug’s work appears in the September/October print issue of Essence), made it apparent that a change had occurred. Krug had left her Algerian roots and been remade, chameleon-like, by Spanish Harlem. “I am boricua, just so you know,” she wrote for Essence last year. Still, the junior scholar told me, “I just sat quietly with it, because who is going to believe me?”
(Krug’s reckoning was finally set in motion after another G.W. professor, H. G. Carrillo, died, in April, at the age of fifty-nine, due to complications of the novel  )Krug’s reckoning was finally set in motion after another G.W. professor, H. G. Carrillo, died, in April, at the age of fifty-nine, due to complications of the novel coronavirus. Carrillo, who went by the nickname Hache (“H” in Spanish, spelled out), was known as a queer Cuban-American author who captured the estranged experience of the Latin American diaspora, notably in his novel “Loosing My Espanish,” from 2004. Upon reading a tribute to the author in the Washington Post, however, Carrillo’s sister and niece contacted the paper with some critical updated information: Carrillo was not born in Cuba but in the United States, Detroit to be exact. His parents were also born in Michigan, and they, like Carrillo (born Herman Glenn Carroll), were Black Americans with no Latino heritage. This was a shock to Carrillo’s husband and to the literary community, prompting conversations among Afro-Latinx writers who had counted him as one of their own.

Jessica Anne Krug grew up in Kansas City, Missouri. Her parents, Stuart and Sherry Krug, worked as a grocer and a teacher, respectively, according to obituaries in the Kansas City Jewish Chronicle. Krug attended the Hyman Brand Hebrew Academy, a Jewish day school located in the suburb of Overland Park, followed by the Barstow School, a prep school in the city proper. In 1996, when she was in the eighth grade, Krug wrote an op-ed in the Kansas City Star against “white-male bashing,” despite her experiences with harassment from people in that demographic. “A few years ago, while taking a shortcut through a local country club, I was confronted by people who uttered slurs about the Jewish star hanging around my neck,” she wrote. She attended Portland State University and later received her doctorate in history from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in 2012. She was “passionate about African and African Diaspora history,” Francisco Scarano, a member of her dissertation committee, told me via e-mail, describing her as a “voracious reader.” After travels to Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America, he said, “she always seem to come back

energized by experiences she had and by the people she had met here.” They never had conversations about her race and ethnicity, though, and Scarano said that he was shocked by the news of her forged identities.
“North African Blackness,” “US rooted Blackness,” “Caribbean rooted Bronx Blackness”—even the coming clean reverts to a sweeping shorthand. In the course of her academic career, Krug has identified as Algerian, African-American, Black Boricua, vaguely Afro-Latinx, vaguely Caribbean; she’s been from Kansas City, from the Bronx, and “of the hood.” Krug’s students, interviewed by The Cut, recalled a “very heavy accent” and an affected brown-girl cool. The trail of locales and labels explicates little besides their author’s own ethnographic tastes. What unites them, though, is Krug’s affinity for Blackness as an instrument of authenticity as she made her way through academia.
Much of the coverage of Krug has reduced her story to this point: the want of Blackness. The comparisons to Rachel Dolezal, the Spokane woman, now known as Nkechi Amare Diallo, who went viral, in 2015, for her own living minstrel act, write themselves. But while Dolezal’s fabrication relied upon a flat sense of Black American identity (the Howard University degree, the leadership position at the N.A.A.C.P.), Krug’s transformation from white to Black was knottier. The places Krug chose to identify with—North Africa, the West Indies, East Harlem, the Bronx—cannily preyed upon a certain American laziness when it comes to parsing race beyond Jim Crow. It is germane that Krug hid among the bona fides of the American humanities, which, still, as a whole, like the nation as a whole, tend toward incuriosity about the difference between race and ethnicity, let alone how one cuts across the other. (Hence the tendency of so many outlets to account for Adele’s showing only in Black and white terms.)
Consider, for instance, the footage that has been circulating from a New York City Council hearing, held over Zoom in June, which shows Krug in her Afro-Latinx pose. She introduces herself as Jess La Bombalera, a nickname apparently of her own making, adapted from Bomba, an Afro-Puerto Rican genre of music and dance. Broadcasting live from “El Barrio,” and wearing purple-tinted shades and a hoop in her nose, she lambasts gentrifiers, shouts out her “black and brown siblings,” and twice calls out “white New Yorkers” for not yielding their speaking time. What stands out, though, is the way Krug speaks, in a patchy accent that begins with thickly rolled “R”s and transitions into what can best be described as B-movie gangster. This is where desire outruns expertise. The Times, in a piece on Krug’s exposure, last week, nonetheless called this a “Latina accent,” lending credence to Krug’s performance. (The phrase was later deleted.) The offhand notation is a tiny example of the buy-in Krug has been afforded her entire scholastic career, by advisers and committee members and editors and colleagues. They failed to recognize the gap not between real and faux, so much, as between something thrown-on and something lived-in. That inattentiveness was Krug’s escape hatch.
A symptomatic reading of the situation is almost too easy. Krug’s academic research is focussed on unhomed peoples whose identities are not reducible to state or tribal filiation—indigenous peoples turned Africans turned slaves turned fugitives who forged a new sense of themselves out of thin air. Her book, “Fugitive Modernities,” from 2018, centers on Kisama, a region within present-day Angola whose people resisted Portuguese enslavement and colonialism in the seventeenth century. It was published by Duke University Press, which is known for its cutting-edge monographs in the area of Black studies. The editorial director, Gisela Fosado, explained in a post on the press’s blog that she, too, had been lied to—in their initial contact, Fosado wrote, Krug claimed that her surname was actually Cruz. Fosado added that she is not sure what’s to be done now with Krug’s scholarship, which “has been widely praised and recognized as important.” I, working far afield from Krug’s work in period, region, and methods, am not equipped to evaluate the fitness of her research. I can only say that her writing is heavy on the kind of equivocation (“and” ... “but” ... “furthermore”) that, in academic texts, can reflect broad-mindedness—or insecurity. After the Medium post was published, excerpts from “Fugitive Modernities” circulated on Twitter. Seasoned authors like to joke about the length of the acknowledgements section in books by début authors, who tend to thank everyone they’ve ever encountered, down to their kindergarten teachers. But Krug is light on thanks, and takes a combative tone. The only person acknowledged by name is the late rapper Biggie Smalls; Krug is tempted, she writes, to just “crib” her comments from him, “to stunt on every institution and person who has ever stood in my way.”

Black studies, a collaborative and multidisciplinary field, is whiter than anyone who hasn’t been in a room with us might assume. Here I’m referring not to the white scholars, though they are plentiful, but to the rest of us: gather us in a group and you’ll be hard pressed to find a tenure-track scholar darker than the proverbial paper bag. There’s a familiar story that accounts for the prevalence of lighter-complected folk in America, the post-bellum legacy of rape—the same narrative that Krug latched onto in making the myth of her “lightskin” presentation, wielding it as a cudgel to protect her against those who might try to pry into the finer points of her background. (According to the junior scholar, during grad school Krug called herself “high yella,” a playfully derogatory term for the fairer African-American set.) But then there is another story that helps account for how someone who looks like Krug can blend in, so to speak: the story of how the lightest among us have a way of perpetuating their lightness over generations, prizing it as it is prized by the institutions they move within. This presents an odd paradox among the scholars presumably best poised to confront white supremacy from inside the university: all of this light skin is not incidental to how Black studies sees itself—to who is promoted, professionally and ideologically, within the field, and to who is extended, as Krug was extended, so much benefit of the doubt.
These things are known but rarely acknowledged in such mixed company. There may be a shift in the air, though. The unravelling of Krug’s charade began with a whisper network of sorts, as so many of these things do. The whispering continues. I am aware of at least one scholar, known for playing with the color line, who quietly modified her institutional bio recently. The self-description now specifies “white.”
(

The Layered Deceptions of Jessica Krug, the Black-Studies Professor Who Hid That She Is White

By Lauren Michele Jackson

September 12, 2020)

Concerning The China Virus From Wuhan, I Have An Opinion

Bill O’Reilly didn’t go home to pout after his ejection from Fox News. He’s still one of the best commentators on current news topics. This is an interesting piece.  

Please keep an open mind… I know, it’s not that easy when someone like O’Reilly is throwing butcher knives.  

This is one of the most concise narratives of what this Covid-19 pandemic is all about. It is written by Bill O’Reilly. Don’t refuse to read just because you may not like him. He is a true student of history and a rabid researcher. He gets the facts before he speaks. He is not a big fan of President Trump, so this is not written in support of him, but an attempt to get the truth out to all of us. 

Please read it with an open mind, absorb it,  do your own research if you don’t trust his. But do not just accept what the media is spitting at you endlessly from behind their partisan platforms - Democratic or Republican, Libertarian, or Socialist. READ IT, PLEASE! It is eye-opening.

An amazing story that explains everything and China’s role in it.

Written by Bill O'Reilly

China’s Bioweapon, and Pelosi...

My wife Angie will tell you that I study history and world events fluently every day. I have studied China for many years. To get answers I need to questions, I call many I know in Washington on Capitol Hill (from my tenure on two Presidential campaigns and Presidential talks) and I ask them for straight-up answers to better understand what affects us as a nation.

Well, in 2016 America elected a new Sheriff:  Donald J Trump. 

For decades the Chinese walked all over America but the new President said “not anymore”. Trump literally strangled China’s economy to the point their economy was in its worst free fall ever. Trump negotiated a new 50 billion trade agreement. He had Xi by the proverbial balls. America’s economy was on fire and unstoppable. President Xi Jinping knew he could not beat the USA militarily and he knew any domesticated economic attack would fail as our economy was too strong. He had to act. But how?

Enter the USA democrats led by Pelosi and Schiff. Impeachment. A hoax. A distraction for our people and President. Xi Jinping and his thugs see this. They aren’t stupid. They have very intelligent intellectual thinkers in their government. Now you must understand, the Chinese regime is truly Barbarians. Notice I did not say ALL CHINESE. Chinese people are good people. I enjoy my interactions with them.

The communist regime has millions of its own citizens slaving in gulags simply for speaking against the government or openly practicing Christianity. Knowing they could not attack us openly they needed to be coy, like a deceptive fox. In my opinion, I believe the regime released a biological weapon upon the world that doesn’t kill everyone but kills “enough,” especially the elderly and in-firmed. Back in WW 2, Hitler thought the same way. He got rid of what he considered the useless and rejects of society.

Trump's task force uses models to figure out things. Xi used and uses “models” too. China's president figured that if he killed a few of his own (a few hundred thousand to them would be a few out of 1.4 billion people) and spread the virus to other nations (especially to the USA) they would “level the economic playing field” and not have fired a shot.

Losses of his own people were acceptable costs of a new war. When China’s own doctors attempted to sound the warning, they were immediately silenced. In fact one died and another has simply disappeared. Trump and the other allied leaders indeed KNOW this is what happened. They have under-reported their own deaths. Trump knows he cannot outrightly seek retribution. His news conference today showed me this when he balked publicly about no outright retribution over Xi’s handling of this and he immediately brought up the “trade deal”.

 However, Trump wasn’t being weak, he too was now being coy. We know this was a biological weapon. The food market story is bullshit.

Xi knows we know it. Trump also today announced he sent two battle groups of destroyers and other ships to sea several days ago to fight drugs and rogue actors like Iran should they try anything.

I say he did this to show Xi he knows what has transpired (we have the greatest intelligence assets) and that they (the Chinese) should rethink further action. Politics is premier. We cannot overtly attack China for what they have done as we would also suffer greatly We all know this.

But China has temporarily achieved its goal. America was literally consumed by Trump's phony impeachment brought by the ultra-left democrats (supported by democrat rank and file and one Republican Mitt Romney) and Xi Jinping saw an opening. 

He took it. Xi did what Trump usually does...he walked onto the world stage and threw a grenade into the “room” and left. It exploded in the form of this worldwide pandemic. It brought the USA and the rest of the world to its knees and leveled the economic playing field.

Our economy is now near depression Xi didn’t fire one bullet. Trump needed to up his game of chess and putting our Naval ships to sea was his next move. He said he is a “war” President. He is.

But now on not one but two fronts. One front is the virus and the other front is the Chinese. While the Saudi’s and Russians are screwing with oil prices they aren’t overtly doing what this pandemic is doing. The drug smuggling story for dispatching the Naval Force is bullshit and the world knows it. I am of the opinion Trump can indeed bring us back from this catastrophe albeit with a changed playing field.

But Trump is a genius in chess and financial matters. He’s become a champ at international politics too. I am sure Trump can once again lead the economy to even stronger strength and greatness than it was. He can do it quickly I’m sure of it. He has proved it. Xi Jinping needs to be sent a message loud and clear. NEVER AGAIN. We need to bring all of our critical manufacturing back from China beginning with our medicines they were recently threatening to withhold. We can do it immediately. Again, another reason for Trump putting to sea such a sizable Naval Force. Sending a clear message.

We all must ride out the next few weeks. Then we and the world pick up the pieces and move on. The democrats who have given Xi this opening wrapped in a bow must pay a heavy price in November as they (the democrats) truly have cost and continue to cost America precious lives by the phony scandals. Nancy Pelosi continues to help the Chinese by her daily shameless attacks upon the President and meddling in stimulus packages as she did this last weekend. Yesterday’s statements she made were truly appalling and the lowest of low. I didn’t think she could go any lower. What a disgrace she is to our nation.

But, Pelosi aside, make no mistake, China must and will be taught a lesson the likes they have never seen before and Trump is the man to pull the trigger.

We the people must teach the democrats the same lesson at the polls.  They (the radical wing of the party) are the enemy of a free America. I am certain of it. The entire democrat party of our forefathers is dead. Remember people, Trump indeed tried to warn us all of the Coronavirus in his State of the Union Speech. He spoke of it. He said he was on top of it. After he spoke, Nancy Pelosi ripped up the speech calling Trump's words “a manifesto of lies”. She disgraced the country and all of our fellow honored citizens present in the House Chamber. Well, she now has American blood on her hands. She is very majorly responsible for these needless deaths as well as the Chinese. She and Adam Schiff.

The left and democrats laughed as she tore up his speech. Well, as they laughed the disease he just spoke of in that speech came to our shores. Republicans and Democrats alike are now dying. Your family members and mine. Our grandparents and middle-aged citizens alike. Our liberty is for the most part suspended. As we bury our dead (without proper funerals) from this calamity let’s drive the nails into the coffin of the Democrat party as well in November.

It’s time people. Stand up for your rights and your country! Our Liberty and survival are at stake!

I am praying for God’s blessing on our nation. But, God also gave us the ability to think for ourselves and it’s time we placed blame for all this death where it belongs: on the doorsteps of Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and Xi Jinping directly. Wake Up America WAKE UP!

Professional Athletes And Social Protesting, Biting The Hands That Feed Them

Open Letter To The NFL PLAYERS. The Boycott is coming.
You graduated high school in 2011. Your teenage years were a struggle. You grew up on the wrong side of the tracks. Your mother was the leader of the family and worked tirelessly to keep a roof over your head and food on your plate.

Academics were a struggle for you and your grades were mediocre at best. The only thing that made you stand out is you weighed 225 lbs and could run 40 yards in 4.2 seconds while carrying a football. Your best friend was just like you, except he didn’t play football. Instead of going to football practice after school, he went to work at McDonald’s for minimum wage.
                                    You were recruited by all the big colleges and spent every weekend of your senior year making visits to universities where coaches and boosters tried to convince you their school was best. They laid out the red carpet for you. Your best friend worked double shifts at Mickey D’s. College was not an option for him. On the day you signed with Big State University, your best friend signed paperwork with his Army recruiter. You went to summer workouts. He went to basic training.

You spent the next four years living in the athletic dorm, eating at the training table. You spent your Saturdays on the football field, cheered on by adoring fans.

Tutors attended to your every academic need. You attended class when you felt like it. Sure, you worked hard. You lifted weights, ran sprints, studied plays, and soon became one of the top football players in the country. Your best friend was assigned to the 101st Airborne Division. While you were in college, he deployed to Iraq once and Afghanistan twice. He became a Sergeant and led a squad of 19-year-old soldiers who grew up just like he did. He shed his blood in Afghanistan and watched young American's give their lives, limbs, and innocence for the US.

You went to the NFL combine and scored off the charts. You hired an agent and waited for draft day. You were drafted in the first round and your agent immediately went to work, ensuring that you received the most money possible. You signed for $16 million although you had never played a single down of professional football. Your best friend re-enlisted in the Army for four more years. As a combat tested sergeant, he will be paid $32,000 per year.

You will drive a Ferrari on the streets of South Beach. He will ride in the back of a Blackhawk helicopter with 10 other combat loaded soldiers. You will sleep at the Ritz. He will dig a hole in the ground and try to sleep. You will “make it rain” in the club. He will pray for rain as the temperature reaches 120 degrees.

On Sunday, you will run into a stadium as tens of thousands of fans cheer and yell your name. For your best friend, there is little difference between Sunday or any other day of the week. There are no adoring fans. There are only people trying to kill him and his soldiers. Every now and then, he and his soldiers leave the front lines and “go to the rear” to rest.

When the National Anthem plays and you take a knee, he will jump to his feet and salute the television. While you protest the unfairness of life in the United States, he will give thanks to God that he has the honor of defending his great country.

To the players of the NFL: We are the people who buy your tickets, watch you on TV, and wear your jerseys. We anxiously wait for Sundays so we can cheer for you and marvel at your athleticism. Although we love to watch you play, we care little about your opinions until you offend us. You have the absolute right to express yourselves, but we have the absolute right to boycott you. We have tolerated your drug use and DUIs, your domestic violence, and your vulgar displays of wealth. We should be ashamed for putting our admiration of your physical skills before what is morally right. But now you have gone too far. You have insulted our flag, our country, our soldiers, our police officers, and our veterans. You are living the American dream, yet you disparage our great country. I encourage all like-minded Americans to boycott the NFL.
 National boycott of the NFL is November 8th & 15th in honor of Veteran’s Day, November 11. Boycott all football telecast, all fans, all ticket holders, stay away from attending any games, let them play to empty stadiums. Pass this post along to all your friends and family. Honor our military - some of whom come home with the American flag draped over their coffin.
Add MLB, NBA, and any other sport that kneels to this

#BoycottNFL #BoycottTheNFL #NFLBoycott
#BoycottNBA #BoycottTheNBA #NBABoycott
#BoycottMLB #MLBBoycott
#USA #Veterans #backtheblue #StandForTheFlag

Kamala Harris Not Eligible To Become President, Is She Eligible To Be Vice President?

The $64 Thousand Question begins with this,

The 14th Amendment has two requirements to become a citizen of the U.S..
1) born in the U.S. and
2) subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
The Supreme Court has yet to address the significance of #2.  Those most interested in the subject have gone back to the intent of the drafters, as expressed before Congress, to determine that the drafters expressly stated that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" excluded the birth of babies of foreign nationals such as diplomatic representatives of foreign countries and persons of foreign nations here legally or illegally.
https://cgalightbearer.blogspot.com/2020/08/kamala-harris-is-not-eligible-for.html
The discussions centered around the term "inhabitants" and the concept of inhabitants owing their allegiance to the U.S.  To understand the importance of this term one must remember the backdrop of events surrounding the 14th Amendment. 
(The Year 1868) This was just after the end of the Civil War.  Most of the Southern states had yet to be admitted back into the Union.  Take Texas, for example and states to come within the territory of the U.S. such as AZ and NM.  These "inhabitants" owed their allegiance to the U.S. and were not yet part of the Union.  Because of the allegiance to the U.S. they became citizens having been born and subject to the jurisdiction thereof of the U.S.  Noteworthy, because of either systemic bias against American Indians or simply because American Indians owned their allegiance to their independent tribe or nation, they were not considered citizens of the U.S. at that time.

So, with the above in mind, people here legally or illegally, from a foreign nation, with a passport and allegiance to that nation, do not fit within the definition of "inhabitants" as that term was used by the framers of the 14th.Amendment.  Their children would have the same allegiance the parents.  For example, John McCain was born in a foreign country to U.S. citizen parents.  He was deemed to have the same allegiance as that of his parents.  I do not recall the circumstances of having a birth certificate of say Spain to U.S. citizens who happen to be there for one reason or another but in that gray area of memory I recall that McCain, when he reached the age of maturity, had to apply for and go through the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag  to obtain a U.S. passport and vote.

So, with the above in mind, after receiving the an email from an astute City Attorney friend of mine and being somewhat intrigued by the questions it raises, I decided to do a Google search to see what I could find.
Do you recall Google, Facebook and the lot being placed on the carpet by Senate hearings regarding their control over what comes up on your research screen when you do a search?  When I plugged in my research criteria I was shocked to see how many articles from all of the alphabet media, newspapers and liberal organizations there were saying, in the headline of the article, "fake", so one reading the result of the research would immediately feel the above email was fake.  I had to go to page 9 to find my first article discussing the subject and revealing questions I have.

What I found is that Kamala's parents were not U.S. citizens.  Her mother was scheduled to go to India for an arranged marriage but, instead, she married Harris.  Both were students at the UniversityCalifornia.  They appear to have been here legally.  Then, the stories split on circumstance.  One, Peggy Noonan of t  he Waall Street Journal, related a wonderful experience of Kamila growing up with the classic American experience.  Others address the fact that Kamila's mother divorced and she and Kamala moved to Canada- suggesting no allegiance to the U.S.- where Kamala was raised without the American experience (OK, Canada is pretty close).

        (Above, Former Senator and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown and Kamala Harris.)

The story goes that Kamala then returned to the U.S. for her college education, thereafter she met California Senator Willie Brown, 15 years  the Speaker of the Assembly, and we know what happened thereafter. She worked for his Law Firm, became his Mistress, and he appointed he r to several influencial Boards of Directors on a salary of $73,000/year each. Eventually with his recommendations she eventually became the Attorney General of California.

Questions I have, beyond the fact that Kamala's parents were not U.S. citizens, include what citizenship did she declare when she was in Canada ( if this is accurate), and how and when did she become a U.S. citizen.  As they say, "prove it"

So, these questions that should not be swept under the rug as they were with Barack Hussein Obama.  Qualification for president is a serious Issue.  If one party, with the ability and money to hide the past or fake the past of a candidate can look to how it worked once will continue to ignore the Constitution and try fix the history of their candidates.  This conduct makes the Constitution meaningless.
Where there are questions, the public should have the freedom to raise the question and the person running for President or Vice President of the United States should automatically have the obligation to prove their citizenship.

 

San Francisco Named Part Of Street For First Black Fireman

Street named after San Francisco’s first Black Fireman 

He was a convert who tried to see the best in people.

Earl Gage Jr. in San Francisco Independent newspaper (Photo courtesy of Blondell Chism via Catholic San Francisco)

 

 

The board of supervisors voted unanimously June 14, 2020 to name a portion of Willow Street between Buchanan and Laguna after Earl Gage Jr.  The street runs through the Western Addition neighborhood of the city where the Gage family — longtime St. Emydius parishioners — lived.“He was a man who kept his strong faith,” said his daughter Blondell Chism on July 24.  “No matter what happened, all was good and he was blessed.”Gage was already a Christian but converted to Catholicism to marry his wife.While the department of public works readies the new street sign for an as-yet-unscheduled installation date, San Francisco Supervisor Dean Preston has commissioned a mural of Gage to accompany it. 

 Gage was hired by the San Francisco Fire Department in 1955 at age 28 and was the sole Black firefighter for the next 12 years. He retired in 1983 and died in 2017 at age 90.His hire was a progressive move for the times and not embraced by all members of the department, said Sherman Tillman, president of the Black Firefighters Association.

 

 

 

There were the fellow firefighters who refused to sleep on any mattress Gage had occupied in the communal firehouse, he said. His mattress was urinated on so repeatedly that the young firefighter took to carrying his own with him from station to station.
“When you think about the discrimination he saw toward himself you’d think a person would be disillusioned and hateful toward the people who did those things,” said Tillman, a longtime parishioner of Star of the Sea Parish on Geary Blvd. “He wasn’t.”
Threats to his safety eventually led Gage away from field work and to a role as the SFFD’s director of community services. There he helped create a new training course for the firefighter’s exam after seeing it was a hurdle for many aspiring firefighters. He was also part of a federal court consent degree that pushed for diversity in the predominantly white, male department.
Tillman called Gage a “man of God who tried to see the best in people despite their flaws….”
The above comes from a July 30 story from Catholic San Francisco via Catholic News Agency.

PARLER, or Twitter, or Facebook, or GAB? You be the Judge.

The Right’s New Favorite Social Media Platform Parler Is Just as Restrictive as Twitter

The platform bans ‘fisticuffs’ but allows ‘buttock’

Sarah Emerson

Jun 26 , 2020

Conservative internet personalities are migrating to Parler, a social media app created in 2018 that bills itself as a “non-biased free speech” platform. The wave of support follows Twitter’s recent decision to permanently suspend Logan Cook, a pro-Trump meme creator who goes by the moniker “CarpeDonktum” and was removed from the platform on Tuesday over repeated copyright violations.

But while Parler claims to promote “free expression,” a closer look at its guidelines reveals a set of rules that in many ways is just as restrictive, or even more so, than Twitter’s own terms of service.

Parler (pronounced “par-lay,” as in the French word meaning “to speak”) was founded by John Matze, a libertarian software developer in Nevada who briefly worked at Amazon, according to LinkedIn. It is functionally similar to Twitter, allowing people to follow other users and access a news feed akin to Twitter Moments but overwhelmingly populated by conservative pundits, politicians, and outlets like Zero Hedge and Epoch Times. Posts can be upvoted or downvoted and “echoed” rather than retweeted. Parler also features a built-in meme maker containing filters such as a “Breaking News” chyron. Matze claims the platform has roughly 1 million users, up from an estimated 100,000 last year.

Parler’s surges in popularity over the past two years have been mostly linked to the moderation of conservative figures on Twitter. Several months after its launch in August, Parler experienced a bump in users after far-right activist Laura Loomer and pro-Trump commentator Candace Owens were respectively banned and suspended by Twitter. Both Owens and Loomer joined Parler in 2018, along with other figures such as YouTube host Paul Joseph Watson, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, and Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale. Matze has appeared on Fox News describing Parler as a haven for people who felt censored online. He added that only content containing “some sort of constitutional violation” would be moderated by the platform.

But a review of Parler’s community guidelines shows the platform has more in common with Twitter than its marketing implies.

Parler’s rules were updated sometime between 2019 and this year. As of July 2019, Parler’s community guidelines protected “offensive speech,” “hate speech ([that] is not considered obscene by the FCC),” and “fake news,” according to a previous version of its rules accessible on the Internet Archive. A vague chart comparing protected and prohibited content allows “dark humor” but discourages “fighting words.” Satire is permitted but not impersonation.

“We want to uphold the rights of free speech according to the U.S. Constitution; however, we also do not want user content to be so obscene that it undermines the core purpose of Parler as a platform for meaningful discussion,” these guidelines state. Parler cites the Federal Communications Commission’s definition of “obscenity,” which regulates on-air programming and has been invoked in recent complaints about mild nudity and profanity, drawing criticism from some First Amendment experts over the scope of its use.

Unlike Gab, another conservative platform that has attracted white supremacists in the wake of events like Charlottesville, Parler has kept a fairly low profile.

Parler’s current community guidelines are more specific and less permissive, and it’s unclear why the company’s rules were changed. Whereas it once allowed “fake news,” it now advises users to “not purposefully share rumors about other users/people you know are false.” Parler previously discouraged fighting words; it now clarifies that rule as “a personal assault with the intention of inviting the other party to fisticuffs.” (Fisticuffs being a somewhat outdated word for fistfight.) The platform prohibits nudity, including female nipples, specifically, and any form of genitalia. Parler does note, however, that “buttock is acceptable.”

For comparison, Twitter forbids images of female breasts, with the exception of breastfeeding. Twitter allows parody or satire accounts but similarly draws the line at impersonation. Much like Twitter’s policy that resulted in the labeling of President Trump’s tweet last month — “When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” Trump wrote of protests in Minneapolis — Parler also discourages content that incites violence or produces a clear and present danger.

So far, none of these rules have been tested to the extent of Twitter’s guidelines. And unlike Gab, another conservative platform that has attracted white supremacists in the wake of events like Charlottesville, Parler has kept a fairly low profile. (All of this could change, however, if Parler manages to court President Trump, for whom Matze has preemptively reserved a handle.) But despite its free speech veneer and anti-moderation promises, Parler is, at present, merely a haven for Twitter social media castoffs.

---

Parler did not immediately respond to OneZero’s questions about its community guidelines.

Parler’s Founder Explains Why He Built Trump’s New Favorite Social Media App

Abram BrownForbes Staff

Business

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 31: U.S. President Donald Trump shouts answers to reporters after Vietnamese ... [+]

Getty Images

“I hope you don’t mind that I’m eating: I haven’t eaten all day,” says Parler founder John Matze, devouring a late lunch. His social media app—a new favorite of President Trump’s and other GOP leaders—has been under siege for the past few hours. “I’m sitting here like, banning trolls.”
By trolls he means teenage leftists who’ve flooded onto Parler after the Trump campaign publicly declared on Wednesday that it might decamp from Facebook and Twitter and refocus its efforts through Parler. Matze knows the leftists’ ages of the trolls, as he calls them, because some verified their accounts, coughing up selfies and driver’s licenses or passports (a set of highly unusual requirements for proving identity and registering for an online account). They’re comment-raiding Parler posts—swamping them with messages that make it unpleasant for the app’s conservative users to post and interact with each other. “They’re trying to get people to have a bad experience and leave,” he says. “We've got a big army of volunteers to help take care of this. It's going to be handled within 48 hours.”
Parler—as in, a parlor room where a chat might happen—is a two-year-old app dedicated, Matze says, to the promulgation of free speech: “The best thing is for everyone to engage with a bad idea and shut it down through public discourse.” Right now, Parler is hosting a very one-sided conversation. It is almost entirely made up of Republican leaders, officials, thinkers and publications. (Liberals account for a “very minute share of the population,” Matze says.) The Trump campaign, of course, is on Parler. Likewise, Trump’s son Eric, his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and his campaign manager, Brad Parscale. Alongside them: senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, the National Rife Association and The Washington Times. Listening to what they say are 1.7 million users, almost double the amount of people on the app in April.

Presumably many have arrived in the days following Trump’s announcement. This moment in the sun for Parler comes courtesy of the president’s on-going feud with Facebook and, especially, Twitter over what he and other conservatives see as censorship and unfair treatment. That tension has grown recently after Twitter applied fact check and explanatory labels on several of Trump’s tweets; Facebook now appears poised to do something similar. Trump has already threatened the social media industry with increased regulation. And he may go a step further than that and move his own digital presence—a key factor in his 2016 victory—over to an app like Parler. It has been a home for the right since its beginning, and it’s an ideal spot for the president’s fiery words given Matze’s devoutly laissez faire attitude toward speech.

"I've been talking about free speech for a while before it was cool," says John Matze, 27, the ... [+]

The Epoch Times

“There are going to be no fact checkers. You're not going to be told what to think and what to say. A police officer isn't going to arrest you if you say the wrong opinion,” says Matze, 27. “I think that's all people want. That's what they like.”
Matze has been weighing these thoughts for some time, stretching back to his time as a University of Denver undergrad, where he studied math, German and business. He found himself leaning a lot toward the conservative economist Thomas Sowell (“very logical”), and he also digs the classic libertarian lodestar Ayn Rand (“very interesting”). Matze describes himself as an arguer. “I don't have too many friends, but the ones I do have, we just talk amongst ourselves about ideas—crazy ones, easy ones, whatever.”
After graduating in 2014, he took shorts gigs as a software developer at number of companies, including a few months at Amazon AMZN . Matze was never into “big central points of authority,” and this included bosses. So he struck out on his own in 2018, raising some angel round money from friends to begin Parler (he won’t say exactly how much).
At the start, the app got a number of lucky boosts. During a networking lunch in 2018, Matze struck up a conversation with Candace Owens, the conservative activist, who promptly began encouraging people to join Parler. By the following June, it had about 200,00 users, a figure that doubled almost overnight when hundreds of thousands of Saudi Arabian dissidents deserted Twitter for Parler, unhappy with what they saw as Twitter protecting the Saudi government. Media outlets including Reuters, Slate and The Daily Beast reported on the exodus, helping Parler keep growing.
Parler functions like a barebones Twitter with users (such as the Trumps and Giuliani) to follow and a feed to see their posts. True to Matze’s hands-off stance, the feed flows chronologically—unlike Twitter’s algorithm-based one. As for the exact rules, Matze is still figuring out which ones should apply, setting up an uncertain landscape that could be stampeded over if Trump carries through on his threat and switches to Parler. For instance, when asked if there ever might be an instance when the N-word would be appropriate, Matze has this answer: “It depends on the context. If they just said that word alone, I don't think we would touch it.” He thinks a couple minutes longer, then restates his opinion. “If somebody came on there and said the N-word to somebody, and they got very upset as a result of that, then it would get taken down.”
Matze is also just initially considering how Parler might make money. His plan: lure conservative influencers onto the platform, then help match them up with advertisers, taking a cut of the what the influencers charge the advertisers to shill their products. To encourage ads, he hopes to be able to offer up a legion of super engaged users—ones like himself. “I've been kind of on my own island on Parler for a while. I don't watch TV. I don't do anything. I get everything off Parler.”

Follow me on Twitter. Send me a secure tip. 

Abram Brown

Abram Brown is a senior editor at Forbes, where he covers social media,

There’s a new social media app trying to give Facebook and Twitter a run for their money -- without the censorship.

Instead of using fact-checkers or a “third party editorial board,” Parler moderates posts based on FCC guidelines and Supreme Court rulings, Parler CEO John Matze told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto on Friday.

“It’ll feel very similar to Twitter, which I’m sure many people are accustomed to,” Matze said. “However ... we take a really firm stance that we want to be unbiased.”
CONSERVATIVES USE TWITTER TO PUSH ALTERNATIVE PARLER APP AFTER TRUMP TWEET FLAGGED
If someone does post something inaccurate on Parler, Matze said the app would not fact-check it. Instead, other users would be able to comment.
“They can make any claim they’d like, but they’re going to be met with a lot of commenters, a lot of people who are going to disagree with them,” Matze said. “That’s how society works, right? If you make a claim, people are going to come and fact check you organically.”

“You don’t need an editorial board of experts to determine what’s true and what’s not,” he added. “The First Amendment was given to us so that we could all talk about issues, not have a single point of authority to determine what is correct and what’s not.”
WILL TRUMP SWITCH FROM TWITTER TO PARLER?
So far, Matze said Parler has gotten a lot of attention from conservatives -- because “they seem to be the ones that are most affected by Twitter censorship or Facebook censorship” -- but the website is for people from all places on the political spectrum.
“We’re a town square,” Matze said. “That’s how I view us. So everyone’s welcome, any kind of discussion.”
“We want people to actually have conversations again,” he added. “The country’s too partisan right now. And when you go on these sites, it feels like a battleground. And so the idea is that you’re going to get on Parler and have discussions with people.”
AG BARR ON TECH COMPANIES CENSORING VIEWPOINTS: ‘THERE’S SOMETHING VERY DISTURBING ABOUT WHAT’S GOING ON’
But it’s not just conservatives who are getting on Parler, Matze said.
“You’re going to see a lot of people on the other side of the aisle coming over very soon,” he said. “In fact, we’re seeing them in waves now. Not to the extent that they’re high-profile individuals, but you’re seeing a lot of people on the left who are actually curious.”
 “They will come in bigger numbers and we’re going to see some bigger names come over, too, when they don’t want to miss out on the conversation,” he added. “They can’t resist.”

However, the app is particularly important for conservatives to have a place where their voices can be heard, Matze said.
“Right now, conservatives need this kind of place, right?” he said. “This is something that they need in an election year, when they’re experiencing censorship or some kind of bias against them, whether it’s perceived or real … People want a place that they can feel like they’re appreciated and their voice matters and they can speak.”
Several Republican lawmakers have already joined the app including Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan.

COMMENTS:

Won’t take long for liberal progressives to migrate over to the new format and begin to contaminate it. It’s what they do for live. They are a cancer upon society.

 

Nothing free about it and these platforms are collective endeavors, designed to stifle opinion- every time.

 

 

PARLER, MINDS, & GAB = the future of social media ..... FREE SPEECH always prevails..... censorship kills!! just like communism!