The Critical Thinking Co.™
"Critical thinking is the identification and evaluation of evidence to guide decision making. A critical thinker uses broad in-depth analysis of evidence to make decisions and communicate his/her beliefs clearly and accurately." "Critical thinking includes the ability to respond to material by distinguishing between facts and opinions or personal feelings, judgments and inferences, inductive and deductive arguments, and the objective and subjective."
Let me tell you how my story ends: I become a tenured, award-winning professor of political science at an Ivy League university, and then at one of the leading universities in the South.
Now let me tell you how my story begins: I grow up in rural Virginia, literally dirt poor. I drop out of school in the eighth grade and have three children by the time I'm 20.
I consider myself to be a reasonably modest person, but even I have to admit that's quite a journey.
How did I do it?
I worked hard. Not crazy, 24/7 hard—just hard. I made good decisions. Not brilliant, three-dimensional-chess decisions—just good ones. I met people along the way who helped me and sincerely wanted to see me succeed—not because they had something to gain, but because they were decent people. Almost all of these individuals, by the way, were white.
But mostly, I think I was blessed in one crucial way: I was born in America, a true land of opportunity for anyone of any color or background. In this country, where you start your life does not determine where you end up.
That works in both directions, by the way. You can start out with every advantage and waste them all. Or you can start out with nothing and become a success. It all depends on you. Your attitude is far more important than your race, gender, or social class in determining what you will accomplish in life.
When I hear young Blacks—or anyone, for that matter—talk about systemic racism, I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I want to laugh because it's such nonsense. I want to cry because I know it's pushing untold numbers of young Blacks into a dead end of self-pity and despair. Instead of seizing the amazing opportunities America offers them, they seize an excuse to explain why they're not succeeding.
I was born into a world where systemic racism was real—no-fooling, outright-bigotry, back-of-the-bus real. But here's what you need to know: Yes, that racism shaped the black experience—but even then, it did not define it. Change was in the air. Call it systemic reform.
The modern Civil Rights Movement was in its infancy, and the leaders who fought for equal rights for Blacks were men and women of all races. They believed in America and were determined to see it live up to its highest ideals—ideals manifest in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.
Did I know, growing up, that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson owned slaves? I don't think I ever thought about it. If I did, I'd like to think that I would have had enough common sense to know that we can't judge men who lived 250 years ago by the moral standards of our own day.
But I know that Jefferson wrote the words in the Declaration of Independence that made slavery ultimately impossible: that all men are created equal. And I know that Washington, Hamilton, Franklin, Adams and the rest of the Founders risked everything to make my world, my America, possible. How could I not be grateful for that and for the sacrifices so many others have made to preserve it?
The truth is I cannot remember a time when I did not love America and feel pride in the belief that I live in the greatest country in the world. I knew if I diligently pursued my ambitions, I could leave the poverty of my early years, with all its abuse and depression, behind me.
I was fortunate in another way. I was spared the life-sapping, negative messages about America that are crippling a generation of young people. These ideas are poison:
☆ White privilege. ☆ Whiteness as a form of property. ☆ Unconscious racism. ☆ Reparations. ☆ Microaggressions. ☆ Police have it out for blacks. ☆ That the United States was created to protect and promote slavery.
These are the ideas young people are told they must accept. And then they're told to reject the ideas that can save them—the antidote: the success principles that enabled me and millions of other Americans to escape lives of poverty.
These principles aren't complicated: work hard, learn from your mistakes, take personal responsibility for your actions. When I made the decisions to get my high school equivalency, attend a community college, and then earn four additional college and university degrees, I believed that my education would open doors. And it did.
It was only when exposed to academic theories of oppression in graduate school that I was informed that because I was Black, poor, and female, I could never do what I had already accomplished.
Thank God, it was too late for these toxic messages to stop me. Don't let them stop you. —Carol Swain
"Color Revolution": Biden team is following carefully scripted coup intended to take down America
'This is a carefully scripted
coup intended to take down our constitutional republic and transform it
into something unrecognizable to our Founders and inimical to our
liberties'
November 5, 2020 (LifeSiteNews)
– I know that some of you may be dispirited, even despairing, that
Trump and all of us who support him didn’t achieve a decisive win on
election day. But events are moving very quickly now. We need everyone
to get back on their feet and back in the game. Your country needs
you. The babies need you.
The first thing everyone must recognize is the seriousness of the current situation. We are in the middle of what is called Color Revolution. This
is a carefully scripted coup intended to take down our constitutional
republic and transform it into something unrecognizable to our Founders
and inimical to our liberties.
This means that what just happened was not a “normal”
election. Rather, it was a pre-scripted scam used by the
revolutionaries to determine how many votes they needed to tip the
balance in their favor. Once they knew that number—in Michigan,
Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania—late ballots are being “discovered” to put
their candidate in the lead. This is how the Left operates in places
like Venezuela. It must not be allowed to succeed here.
The forces arrayed against us are formidable. I’m not talking here
just about the Democrat Party. Despite the fact that it has been
hollowed out by Socialists, it alone could be dealt with. Rather, I’m
talking also about the Globalists and their institutions, including Wall
Street and the major U.S. media. And, of course, I’m talking about the
Chinese Communists and their many front organizations and flunkies in
the United States. Joe Biden is the compromise candidate of all these
groups.
In the same way, the chaos is not just about President Trump; it is
about defeating and disarming every last one of us who believes in the
promise of America as a sovereign nation that defends life, protects
liberty, and preserves equal justice before the law. As the president
has said, “They are really after you. I am just in the way.”
In order to encourage each other and organize, we must all move onto
new media. Even Fox (aside from the evening talk show hosts) can no
longer be trusted. Sign up for LifeSiteNews
and other news sites like Epoch Times, Breitbart, Newsmax, One America
News (OAN), or Real America’s Voice. Use Twitter but link up on Parler
as well for the day when @Jack shuts you down like he has so many
others.
To encourage ourselves and others, keep the Trump signs up and the
flags flying. Ramp back up the Trump Trains that shocked the
opposition. I look for the President and his surrogates to start
holding rallies again soon. It’s a great way for him to bypass the
hostile media and speak directly to the American people.
Don’t listen to the voices of surrender—there will surely be a few of
these from the members of the Republican Establishment. Take your cues
instead from people like Newt Gingrich, Tom Cotton, Allen West, Mike
Huckabee, Donald Trump Jr., and, of course, from the President
himself.
Finally and most importantly, we must pray. Try to spend some time
before the Blessed Sacrament to pray for our country and our president.
The late, great Father John Hardon often reminded us to never
underestimate the graces that flow from spending any amount of time in
His Eucharistic presence.
Prayer can change history. We all know about the Battle of
Lepanto. But let me also share with you a much more recent example that
comes from the “People Power” revolution in the Philippines which was
shared with me by Cardinal Jaime Sin, the then-Cardinal-Archbishop of
Manilla, over dinner some years ago.
In 1986, the people of Manilla rose up and demanded an end to the
dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos. Cardinal Sin was afraid that the
demonstrations, which grew larger every day, would end in a government
crackdown and much bloodshed.
He called all of the convents in the country and begged the nuns to
get down on their knees before the Blessed Sacrament and pray for divine
intervention. “Raise your arms to Heaven as Moses did and pray for
victory,” he told them. “Pray that Marcos will step down, and democracy
restored.”
The key moment came when the demonstrators approached the
presidential palace. The palace guard was lined up in firing
position. Just as the commander was about to give the order to fire, a
beautiful lady appeared in the sky before the soldiers. They all
simultaneously took their fingers off the triggers.
The massacre was averted and Marcos fled.
In order to defeat those who would steal not just an election, but our very country, we must likewise storm Heaven.
Steven W. Mosher is the President of the Population Research
Institute and the author of Bully of Asia: Why China’s Dream is the New
Threat to World Order
CON'T
As devout Christians and faithful citizens of the United States of
America, we have intense and heartfelt concern for the fate of our
beloved country while the final results of the Presidential election are
still uncertain.
News of electoral fraud is multiplying, despite the shameful attempts
of the mainstream media to censor the truth of the facts in order to
give their candidate the advantage. There are states in which the number
of votes is greater than the number of voters; others in which the
mail-in vote seems to be exclusively in favor of Joe Biden; others in
which the counting of ballots has been suspended for no reason or where
sensational tampering has been discovered: always and only against
President Donald J. Trump, always and only in favor of Biden.
In truth, for months now we have been witnessing a continuous trickle
of staggered news, of manipulated or censored information, of crimes
that have been silenced or covered up in the face of striking evidence
and irrefutable testimony. We have seen the deep state organize itself,
well in advance, to carry out the most colossal electoral fraud in
history, in order to ensure the defeat of the man who has strenuously
opposed the establishment of the New World Order that is wanted by the
children of darkness. In this battle, you have not failed, as is your
sacred duty, to make your own contribution by taking the side of the
Good. Others, enslaved by vices or blinded by infernal hatred against
Our Lord, have taken the side of Evil.
Do not think that the children of darkness act with honesty, and do
not be scandalized if they operate with deception. Do you perhaps
believe that Satan’s followers are honest, sincere, and loyal? The Lord
has warned us against the Devil: “He was a murderer from the
beginning and does not stand in truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he tells a lie, he speaks in character, because he is a liar and
the father of lies” (Jn 8:44).
Trump Planned Ahead!! Secretly Marked All Official Ballots, like the Silk Threads in U S Money Paper.
News Feed posts
Daily magyar
2h ·
Csúnya, mint a bűn. [ˈtʃuːɲɑ mint ɑ byːn]
or
Csúnya, akar a bűn. [ˈtʃuːɲɑ ɑkɑr ɑ byːn] (gipsy slang)
Translation: He/she/it is ugly as sin.
Meaning: He/she/it is ugly as fuck.; He/she/it is really ugly.
csúnya [ˈtʃuːɲɑ] – ugly; nasty
mint [ˈmint] – than; as…as; like
akár [ˈɑkaːr] – just like; as; like
akar [ˈɑkɑr]
1) just like; as; like (dialectical word or gipsy slang)
2) he/she wants
akarni [ˈɑkɑrni] – to want
bűn [ˈbyːn] – sin; vice; guilt
Jessica A. Krug, then an associate professor at George
Washington University, posted a confession on the publishing platform
Medium, last Thursday, explaining that she is not who she’d been
claiming to be. “To an escalating degree over my adult life,” she wrote,
“I have eschewed my lived experience as a white Jewish child in
suburban Kansas City under various assumed identities within a Blackness
that I had no right to claim: first North African Blackness, then US
rooted Blackness, then Caribbean rooted Bronx Blackness.” Her life and,
by extension, her scholarly career—or is it the other way around?—had
been based on a lie, she admitted, or rather a glut of them, feeding on
good faith like, as Krug put it, “not a culture vulture” but “a culture
leech.”The blog post is light on details—the where, when, and how
of Krug’s masquerade. She speculates that “mental health issues” were
an impetus for her behavior; professionals have assured her that altered
identity is a “common response” to “the severe trauma” that she
incurred during childhood. But she does not name a diagnosis or
elaborate upon the instigating traumatic events, resorting instead to
the generic jargon of self-help, blended with the D.I.Y. verbiage
endemic to the self-care branch of social justice: “redress,” “harm,” “gaslit,” “belonging,”
“accountability.” (Absent are the words “sorry” and “apologize.”) The
post is not well written, but it wants to be—its self-flagellations
taking on the repetitious rhythms of slam poetry. (“I am a coward…. I am
a coward”; “Intention never matters more than impact.”) The performance
is, above all, profoundly awkward. For all her apparent study of the
ways in which certain oppressed groups address wrongs that are done,
Krug proves incapable of writing her way to recompense. “You should
absolutely cancel me, and I absolutely cancel myself,” she writes,
borrowing, with all sincerity, a term of cultural panic that lost its
candor eons ago. “What does that mean?” she asks. “I don’t know.” Within
twenty-four hours, a group of Krug’s colleagues at G.W. released a
statement calling on her to resign or, if not, to be stripped of her
tenure and fired. “With her conduct, Dr. Krug has raised questions about
the veracity of her own research and teaching,” the G.W. Department of
History said in a written statement posted to its Web site. On
Wednesday, it was announced that Krug had resigned. (She did not respond
to my requests to speak with her.)
It seems that Krug exposed herself to avoid being exposed. “I had been following her
transformation for a while,” a scholar in Krug’s field told me. The
scholar, a junior professor who wished to remain anonymous, met Krug
more than a decade ago. “The first time I encountered her, she would
talk about ‘us’ and ‘we,’ ” the junior professor said over the phone.
“And I was scratching my head, like, ‘us’ and ‘we’? And then I realized
she meant Black.” Specifically, “part Algerian”—Krug said that she was
the daughter of Algerian immigrants on her mother’s side, and that her
father was a white man of German origin. “I took her at her word,” the
professor said, “But I always had certain misgivings.” Krug spoke back
then of trauma as part of her heritage, describing herself as the
product of rape between her mother and father, and the junior professor
said that she didn’t want to impinge on Krug by bringing it up, even as
she and other friends, all Latinx, harbored doubts about Krug’s claims.
The way Krug spoke about the junior professor’s own identity was part of
what aroused her suspicion. “I’m middle class. I’ve never tried to be
anything else,” she said. “I think she was pushing me or encouraging me
to adopt a more radical political position.” These sorts of challenges
ate away at the remaining amiability between
Krug and her Afro-Latinx peers. “There came a point when we were
just, like, ‘This is bullshit.’ ” Still, they were operating on a
feeling. Without proof or a violation of academic protocol or issues
with Krug’s scholarship—“I always respected her intellectually,” the
junior professor said—there was nothing to be done but add distance.
“There wasn’t any big dramatic moment. I just quietly severed the
relationship on all fronts.”
Years later, Krug came back on the
scholar’s radar when mutual friends on Facebook shared articles Krug had
written for RaceBaitr, a platform for race-forward news and criticism,
and later for Essence. Those articles, now deleted (though Krug’s work appears in the September/October print issue of Essence),
made it apparent that a change had occurred. Krug had left her Algerian
roots and been remade, chameleon-like, by Spanish Harlem. “I am
boricua, just so you know,” she wrote for Essence last year. Still, the junior scholar told me, “I just sat quietly with it, because who is going to believe me?”
(Krug’s
reckoning was finally set in motion after another G.W. professor, H. G.
Carrillo, died, in April, at the age of fifty-nine, due to
complications of the novel )Krug’s reckoning was finally set in motion after another G.W. professor,
H. G. Carrillo, died, in April, at the age of fifty-nine, due to
complications of the novel coronavirus. Carrillo, who went by the
nickname Hache (“H” in Spanish, spelled out), was known as a queer
Cuban-American author who captured the estranged experience of the Latin
American diaspora, notably in his novel “Loosing My Espanish,” from 2004. Upon reading a tribute to the author in the Washington Post,
however, Carrillo’s sister and niece contacted the paper with some
critical updated information: Carrillo was not born in Cuba but in the
United States, Detroit to be exact. His parents were also born in
Michigan, and they, like Carrillo (born Herman Glenn Carroll), were
Black Americans with no Latino heritage. This was a shock to Carrillo’s
husband and to the literary community, prompting conversations among
Afro-Latinx writers who had counted him as one of their own.
Jessica Anne Krug grew up in Kansas City, Missouri. Her parents, Stuart
and Sherry Krug, worked as a grocer and a teacher, respectively,
according to obituaries in the Kansas City Jewish Chronicle.
Krug attended the Hyman Brand Hebrew Academy, a Jewish day school
located in the suburb of Overland Park, followed by the Barstow School, a
prep school in the city proper. In 1996, when she was in the eighth
grade, Krug wrote an op-ed in the Kansas City Star against
“white-male bashing,” despite her experiences with harassment from
people in that demographic. “A few years ago, while taking a shortcut
through a local country club, I was confronted by people who uttered
slurs about the Jewish star hanging around my neck,” she wrote. She
attended Portland State University and later received her doctorate in
history from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in 2012. She was
“passionate about African and African Diaspora history,” Francisco
Scarano, a member of her dissertation committee, told me via e-mail,
describing her as a “voracious reader.” After travels to Africa, the
Caribbean, and Latin America, he said, “she always seem to come back
energized by experiences she had and by the people she had met here.”
They never had conversations about her race and ethnicity, though, and
Scarano said that he was shocked by the news of her forged identities.
“North
African Blackness,” “US rooted Blackness,” “Caribbean rooted Bronx
Blackness”—even the coming clean reverts to a sweeping shorthand. In the
course of her academic career, Krug has identified as Algerian,
African-American, Black Boricua, vaguely Afro-Latinx, vaguely Caribbean;
she’s been from Kansas City, from the Bronx, and “of the hood.” Krug’s
students, interviewed by The Cut,
recalled a “very heavy accent” and an affected brown-girl cool. The
trail of locales and labels explicates little besides their author’s own
ethnographic tastes. What unites them, though, is Krug’s affinity for
Blackness as an instrument of authenticity as she made her way through
academia.
Much of the coverage of Krug has reduced her story to
this point: the want of Blackness. The comparisons to Rachel Dolezal,
the Spokane woman, now known as Nkechi Amare Diallo, who went viral, in 2015, for her own living
minstrel act, write themselves. But while Dolezal’s fabrication relied
upon a flat sense of Black American identity (the Howard University
degree, the leadership position at the N.A.A.C.P.), Krug’s
transformation from white to Black was knottier. The places Krug chose
to identify with—North Africa, the West Indies, East Harlem, the
Bronx—cannily preyed upon a certain American laziness when it comes to
parsing race beyond Jim Crow. It is germane that Krug hid among the bona
fides of the American humanities, which, still, as a whole, like the
nation as a whole, tend toward incuriosity about the difference between
race and ethnicity, let alone how one cuts across the other. (Hence the
tendency of so many outlets to account for Adele’s showing only in Black
and white terms.)
Consider, for instance, the footage
that has been circulating from a New York City Council hearing, held
over Zoom in June, which shows Krug in her Afro-Latinx pose. She
introduces herself as Jess La Bombalera, a nickname apparently of her
own making, adapted from Bomba, an Afro-Puerto Rican genre of music and
dance. Broadcasting live from “El Barrio,” and wearing purple-tinted
shades and a hoop in her nose, she lambasts gentrifiers, shouts out her “black and brown
siblings,” and twice calls out “white New Yorkers” for not yielding
their speaking time. What stands out, though, is the way Krug speaks, in
a patchy accent that begins with thickly rolled “R”s and transitions
into what can best be described as B-movie gangster. This is where
desire outruns expertise. The Times, in a piece
on Krug’s exposure, last week, nonetheless called this a “Latina
accent,” lending credence to Krug’s performance. (The phrase was later
deleted.) The offhand notation is a tiny example of the buy-in Krug has
been afforded her entire scholastic career, by advisers and committee
members and editors and colleagues. They failed to recognize the gap not
between real and faux, so much, as between something thrown-on and
something lived-in. That inattentiveness was Krug’s escape hatch.
A
symptomatic reading of the situation is almost too easy. Krug’s
academic research is focussed on unhomed peoples whose identities are
not reducible to state or tribal filiation—indigenous peoples turned
Africans turned slaves turned fugitives who forged a new sense of
themselves out of thin air. Her book, “Fugitive Modernities,” from 2018, centers on Kisama, a region within present-day Angola whose people
resisted Portuguese enslavement and colonialism in the seventeenth
century. It was published by Duke University Press, which is known for
its cutting-edge monographs in the area of Black studies. The editorial
director, Gisela Fosado, explained in a post on the press’s blog
that she, too, had been lied to—in their initial contact, Fosado wrote,
Krug claimed that her surname was actually Cruz. Fosado added that she
is not sure what’s to be done now with Krug’s scholarship, which “has
been widely praised and recognized as important.” I, working far afield
from Krug’s work in period, region, and methods, am not equipped to
evaluate the fitness of her research. I can only say that her writing is
heavy on the kind of equivocation (“and” ... “but” ... “furthermore”)
that, in academic texts, can reflect broad-mindedness—or insecurity.
After the Medium post was published, excerpts from “Fugitive
Modernities” circulated on Twitter. Seasoned authors like to joke about
the length of the acknowledgements section in books by début authors,
who tend to thank everyone they’ve ever encountered, down to their
kindergarten teachers. But Krug is light on thanks, and takes a
combative tone. The only person acknowledged by name is the late rapper
Biggie Smalls; Krug is tempted, she writes, to just “crib” her comments
from him, “to stunt on every institution and person who has ever stood
in my way.”
Black
studies, a collaborative and multidisciplinary field, is whiter than
anyone who hasn’t been in a room with us might assume. Here I’m
referring not to the white scholars, though they are plentiful, but to
the rest of us: gather us in a group and you’ll be hard pressed to find a
tenure-track scholar darker than the proverbial paper bag. There’s a
familiar story that accounts for the prevalence of lighter-complected
folk in America, the post-bellum legacy of rape—the same narrative that
Krug latched onto in making the myth of her “lightskin” presentation,
wielding it as a cudgel to protect her against those who might try to pry into the
finer points of her background. (According to the junior scholar, during
grad school Krug called herself “high yella,” a playfully derogatory
term for the fairer African-American set.) But then there is another
story that helps account for how someone who looks like Krug can blend
in, so to speak: the story of how the lightest among us have a way of
perpetuating their lightness over generations, prizing it as it is
prized by the institutions they move within. This presents an odd
paradox among the scholars presumably best poised to confront white
supremacy from inside the university: all of this light skin is not
incidental to how Black studies sees itself—to who is promoted,
professionally and ideologically, within the field, and to who is
extended, as Krug was extended, so much benefit of the doubt.
These
things are known but rarely acknowledged in such mixed company. There
may be a shift in the air, though. The unravelling of Krug’s charade
began with a whisper network of sorts, as so many of these things do.
The whispering continues. I am aware of at least one scholar, known for
playing with the color line, who quietly modified her institutional bio
recently. The self-description now specifies “white.”
(
The Layered Deceptions of Jessica Krug, the Black-Studies Professor Who Hid That She Is White
Bill
O’Reilly didn’t go home to pout after his ejection from Fox News. He’s
still one of the best commentators on current news topics. This is an
interesting piece.
Please keep an open mind… I know, it’s not that easy when someone like O’Reilly is throwing butcher knives.
This
is one of the most concise narratives of what this Covid-19 pandemic is
all about. It is written by Bill O’Reilly. Don’t refuse to read just
because you may not like him. He is a true student of history and a
rabid researcher. He gets the facts before he speaks. He
is not a big fan of President Trump, so this is not written in support
of him, but an attempt to get the truth out to all of us.
Please read it with an open mind, absorb it, do
your own research if you don’t trust his. But do not just accept what
the media is spitting at you endlessly from behind their partisan
platforms - Democratic or Republican, Libertarian, or Socialist. READ
IT, PLEASE! It is eye-opening.
An amazing story that explains everything and China’s role in it.
Written by Bill O'Reilly
China’s Bioweapon, and Pelosi...
My
wife Angie will tell you that I study history and world events fluently
every day. I have studied China for many years. To get answers I need
to questions, I call many I know in Washington on Capitol Hill (from my
tenure on two Presidential campaigns and Presidential talks) and I ask
them for straight-up answers to better understand what affects us as a
nation.
Well, in 2016 America elected a new Sheriff: Donald J Trump.
For
decades the Chinese walked all over America but the new President said
“not anymore”. Trump literally strangled China’s economy to the point
their economy was in its worst free fall ever. Trump negotiated a new 50
billion trade agreement. He had Xi by the proverbial balls. America’s
economy was on fire and unstoppable. President Xi Jinping knew he could
not beat the USA militarily and he knew any domesticated economic attack
would fail as our economy was too strong. He had to act. But how?
Enter
the USA democrats led by Pelosi and Schiff. Impeachment. A hoax. A
distraction for our people and President. Xi Jinping and his thugs see
this. They aren’t stupid. They have very intelligent intellectual
thinkers in their government. Now you must understand, the Chinese
regime is truly Barbarians. Notice I did not say ALL CHINESE. Chinese
people are good people. I enjoy my interactions with them.
The
communist regime has millions of its own citizens slaving in gulags
simply for speaking against the government or openly practicing
Christianity. Knowing they could not attack us openly they needed to be
coy, like a deceptive fox. In my opinion, I believe the regime released a
biological weapon upon the world that doesn’t kill everyone but kills
“enough,” especially the elderly and in-firmed. Back in WW 2, Hitler
thought the same way. He got rid of what he considered the useless and
rejects of society.
Trump's
task force uses models to figure out things. Xi used and uses “models”
too. China's president figured that if he killed a few of his own (a few
hundred thousand to them would be a few out of 1.4 billion people) and
spread the virus to other nations (especially to the USA) they would
“level the economic playing field” and not have fired a shot.
Losses
of his own people were acceptable costs of a new war. When China’s own
doctors attempted to sound the warning, they were immediately silenced.
In fact one died and another has simply disappeared. Trump and the other
allied leaders indeed KNOW this is what happened. They have
under-reported their own deaths. Trump knows he cannot outrightly seek
retribution. His news conference today showed me this when he balked
publicly about no outright retribution over Xi’s handling of this and he
immediately brought up the “trade deal”.
However,
Trump wasn’t being weak, he too was now being coy. We know this was a
biological weapon. The food market story is bullshit.
Xi
knows we know it. Trump also today announced he sent two battle groups
of destroyers and other ships to sea several days ago to fight drugs and
rogue actors like Iran should they try anything.
I
say he did this to show Xi he knows what has transpired (we have the
greatest intelligence assets) and that they (the Chinese) should rethink
further action. Politics is premier. We cannot overtly attack China for
what they have done as we would also suffer greatly We all know this.
But China has temporarily achieved its goal. America
was literally consumed by Trump's phony impeachment brought by the
ultra-left democrats (supported by democrat rank and file and one
Republican Mitt Romney) and Xi Jinping saw an opening.
He
took it. Xi did what Trump usually does...he walked onto the world
stage and threw a grenade into the “room” and left. It exploded in the
form of this worldwide pandemic. It brought the USA and the rest of the
world to its knees and leveled the economic playing field.
Our
economy is now near depression Xi didn’t fire one bullet. Trump needed
to up his game of chess and putting our Naval ships to sea was his next
move. He said he is a “war” President. He is.
But
now on not one but two fronts. One front is the virus and the other
front is the Chinese. While the Saudi’s and Russians are screwing with
oil prices they aren’t overtly doing what this pandemic is doing. The
drug smuggling story for dispatching the Naval Force is bullshit and the
world knows it. I am of the opinion Trump can indeed bring us back from this catastrophe albeit with a changed playing field.
But
Trump is a genius in chess and financial matters. He’s become a champ
at international politics too. I am sure Trump can once again lead the
economy to even stronger strength and greatness than it was. He can do
it quickly I’m sure of it. He has proved it. Xi Jinping needs to be sent
a message loud and clear. NEVER AGAIN. We need to bring all of our
critical manufacturing back from China beginning with our medicines they
were recently threatening to withhold. We can do it immediately. Again,
another reason for Trump putting to sea such a sizable Naval Force.
Sending a clear message.
We
all must ride out the next few weeks. Then we and the world pick up the
pieces and move on. The democrats who have given Xi this opening
wrapped in a bow must pay a heavy price in November as they (the
democrats) truly have cost and continue to cost America precious lives
by the phony scandals. Nancy Pelosi continues to help the Chinese by her
daily shameless attacks upon the President and meddling in stimulus
packages as she did this last weekend. Yesterday’s statements she made
were truly appalling and the lowest of low. I didn’t think she could go
any lower. What a disgrace she is to our nation.
But,
Pelosi aside, make no mistake, China must and will be taught a lesson
the likes they have never seen before and Trump is the man to pull the
trigger.
We the people must teach the democrats the same lesson at the polls. They
(the radical wing of the party) are the enemy of a free America. I am
certain of it. The entire democrat party of our forefathers is dead.
Remember people, Trump indeed tried to warn us all of the Coronavirus in
his State of the Union Speech. He spoke of it. He said he was on top of
it. After he spoke, Nancy Pelosi ripped up the speech calling Trump's
words “a manifesto of lies”. She disgraced the country and all of our
fellow honored citizens present in the House Chamber. Well, she now has
American blood on her hands. She is very majorly responsible for these
needless deaths as well as the Chinese. She and Adam Schiff.
The
left and democrats laughed as she tore up his speech. Well, as they
laughed the disease he just spoke of in that speech came to our shores.
Republicans and Democrats alike are now dying. Your family members and
mine. Our grandparents and middle-aged citizens alike. Our liberty is
for the most part suspended. As we bury our dead (without proper
funerals) from this calamity let’s drive the nails into the coffin of
the Democrat party as well in November.
It’s time people. Stand up for your rights and your country! Our Liberty and survival are at stake!
I
am praying for God’s blessing on our nation. But, God also gave us the
ability to think for ourselves and it’s time we placed blame for all
this death where it belongs: on the doorsteps of Nancy Pelosi, Adam
Schiff, and Xi Jinping directly. Wake Up America WAKE UP!
Open Letter To The NFL PLAYERS. The Boycott is coming. You
graduated high school in 2011. Your teenage years were a struggle. You
grew up on the wrong side of the tracks. Your mother was the leader of
the family and worked tirelessly to keep a roof over your head and food
on your plate.
Academics were a struggle for you and your grades
were mediocre at best. The only thing that made you stand out is you
weighed 225 lbs and could run 40 yards in 4.2 seconds while carrying a
football. Your best friend was just like you, except he didn’t play
football. Instead of going to football practice after school, he went to
work at McDonald’s for minimum wage. You were recruited by all
the big colleges and spent every weekend of your senior year making
visits to universities where coaches and boosters tried to convince you
their school was best. They laid out the red carpet for you. Your best
friend worked double shifts at Mickey D’s. College was not an option for
him. On the day you signed with Big State University, your best friend
signed paperwork with his Army recruiter. You went to summer workouts.
He went to basic training.
You spent the next four years living
in the athletic dorm, eating at the training table. You spent your
Saturdays on the football field, cheered on by adoring fans.
Tutors
attended to your every academic need. You attended class when you felt
like it. Sure, you worked hard. You lifted weights, ran sprints, studied
plays, and soon became one of the top football players in the country.
Your best friend was assigned to the 101st Airborne Division. While you
were in college, he deployed to Iraq once and Afghanistan twice. He
became a Sergeant and led a squad of 19-year-old soldiers who grew up
just like he did. He shed his blood in Afghanistan and watched young
American's give their lives, limbs, and innocence for the US.
You
went to the NFL combine and scored off the charts. You hired an agent
and waited for draft day. You were drafted in the first round and your
agent immediately went to work, ensuring that you received the most
money possible. You signed for $16 million although you had never played
a single down of professional football. Your best friend re-enlisted in
the Army for four more years. As a combat tested sergeant, he will be
paid $32,000 per year.
You will drive a Ferrari on the streets of
South Beach. He will ride in the back of a Blackhawk helicopter with 10
other combat loaded soldiers. You will sleep at the Ritz. He will dig a
hole in the ground and try to sleep. You will “make it rain” in the
club. He will pray for rain as the temperature reaches 120 degrees.
On
Sunday, you will run into a stadium as tens of thousands of fans cheer
and yell your name. For your best friend, there is little difference
between Sunday or any other day of the week. There are no adoring fans.
There are only people trying to kill him and his soldiers. Every now and
then, he and his soldiers leave the front lines and “go to the rear” to
rest.
When the National Anthem plays and you take a knee, he
will jump to his feet and salute the television. While you protest the
unfairness of life in the United States, he will give thanks to God that
he has the honor of defending his great country.
To the players
of the NFL: We are the people who buy your tickets, watch you on TV, and
wear your jerseys. We anxiously wait for Sundays so we can cheer for
you and marvel at your athleticism. Although we love to watch you play,
we care little about your opinions until you offend us. You have the
absolute right to express yourselves, but we have the absolute right to
boycott you. We have tolerated your drug use and DUIs, your domestic
violence, and your vulgar displays of wealth. We should be ashamed for
putting our admiration of your physical skills before what is morally
right. But now you have gone too far. You have insulted our flag, our
country, our soldiers, our police officers, and our veterans. You are
living the American dream, yet you disparage our great country. I
encourage all like-minded Americans to boycott the NFL. National
boycott of the NFL is November 8th & 15th in honor of Veteran’s
Day, November 11. Boycott all football telecast, all fans, all ticket
holders, stay away from attending any games, let them play to empty
stadiums. Pass this post along to all your friends and family. Honor our
military - some of whom come home with the American flag draped over
their coffin. Add MLB, NBA, and any other sport that kneels to this
The 14th
Amendment has two requirements to become a citizen of the U.S..
1) born
in the U.S. and
2) subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
The Supreme
Court has yet to address the significance of #2. Those most interested
in the subject have gone back to the intent of the drafters, as
expressed before Congress, to determine that the drafters expressly
stated that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" excluded the birth of
babies of foreign nationals such as diplomatic representatives of
foreign countries and persons of foreign nations here legally or
illegally. https://cgalightbearer.blogspot.com/2020/08/kamala-harris-is-not-eligible-for.html
The discussions centered around the term "inhabitants" and
the concept of inhabitants owing their allegiance to the U.S. To
understand the importance of this term one must remember the backdrop of
events surrounding the 14th Amendment.
(The Year 1868) This was just after the end
of the Civil War. Most of the Southern states had yet to be admitted
back into the Union. Take Texas, for example and states to come within
the territory of the U.S. such as AZ and NM. These "inhabitants" owed
their allegiance to the U.S. and were not yet part of the Union.
Because of the allegiance to the U.S. they became citizens having been
born and subject to the jurisdiction thereof of the U.S. Noteworthy,
because of either systemic bias against American Indians or simply
because American Indians owned their allegiance to their independent
tribe or nation, they were not considered citizens of the U.S. at that
time.
So,
with the above in mind, people here legally or illegally, from a
foreign nation, with a passport and allegiance to that nation, do not
fit within the definition of "inhabitants" as that term was used by the
framers of the 14th.Amendment. Their children would have the same
allegiance the
parents. For example, John McCain was born in a foreign country to
U.S. citizen parents. He was deemed to have the same allegiance as that
of his
parents. I do not recall the circumstances of having a birth
certificate of say Spain to U.S. citizens who happen to be there for one
reason or another but in that gray area of memory I recall that McCain,
when he reached the age of maturity, had to apply for and go through
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag to obtain a U.S. passport and
vote.
So,
with the above in mind, after receiving the an email from an astute City Attorney friend of mine and being
somewhat intrigued by the questions it raises, I decided to do a Google
search to see what I could find.
Do you recall Google, Facebook and the
lot being placed on the carpet by Senate hearings regarding their
control over what comes up on your research screen when you do a
search? When I plugged in my research criteria I was shocked to see how
many articles from all of the alphabet media, newspapers and liberal
organizations there were saying, in the headline of the article, "fake",
so one reading the result of the research would immediately feel the
above email was fake. I had to go to page 9 to find my first article
discussing the subject and revealing questions I have.
What
I found is that Kamala's parents were not U.S. citizens. Her
mother
was scheduled to go to India for an arranged marriage but, instead,
she married Harris. Both were students at the UniversityCalifornia.
They appear to have been
here legally. Then, the stories split on circumstance. One, Peggy
Noonan of t he Waall Street Journal, related a wonderful experience of
Kamila growing up with the
classic American experience. Others address the fact that Kamila's
mother divorced and she and Kamala moved to Canada- suggesting no
allegiance to the U.S.- where Kamala was raised without the American
experience (OK, Canada is pretty close).
(Above, Former Senator and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown and Kamala Harris.)
The
story goes that Kamala
then returned to the U.S. for her college education, thereafter she met
California Senator Willie Brown, 15 years the Speaker of the Assembly,
and we know what happened thereafter. She worked for his Law Firm,
became his Mistress, and he appointed he r to several influencial Boards
of Directors on a salary of $73,000/year each. Eventually with his
recommendations she eventually became the Attorney General of
California.
Questions
I have, beyond the fact that Kamala's parents were not U.S. citizens,
include what citizenship did she declare when she was in Canada ( if
this is accurate), and how and when did she become a U.S. citizen. As they say,
"prove it"
So,
these questions that should not be swept under the rug as
they were with Barack Hussein Obama. Qualification for president is a serious Issue.
If one party, with the ability and money to hide the past or fake the
past of a candidate can look to how it worked once will continue to
ignore the Constitution and try fix the history of their candidates. This
conduct makes the Constitution meaningless.
Where there are questions,
the public should have the freedom to raise the question and the person
running for President or Vice President of the United States should automatically have the obligation to prove
their citizenship.
I am a thoroughly civilized, humane, cosmopolitan, polished, restrained, enjoyable, entertaining Info-maniac. I am a staunch exponent of individual dignity, freedom, equal access to legal services, and equal protection of the law. Here I hope to demonstrate my emotional restraint, humbleness of sentiment, psychological subtlety, lucid style, and simple language, without evading political reality or eternal truth. Daily I am excited that I have the right to create the beginning of a new self and to challenge old habits and attitudes I no longer choose to accept. I choose to relax in the present with my direction firmly in mind. I have an enormous capacity for creative and clever ideas and thoughts. It is phenomenal what I can do. I am capable of so much learning and absorbing a lot of information. My potential is a source of pleasant surprise for me.
Each day, I increase in knowledge, skills, strength, faith, and abilities.With each adventure, the boundary hemming in my potential expands easily to accomodate my growth and achievements.